Senators Test Kagan Questions During Matheson Confirmation Hearing
Deseret News (Salt Lake City) › May 14, 2010
Linked as:
Deseret News (Salt Lake City) › May 14, 2010
Linked as:Summary
WASHINGTON -- The confirmation hearing of 10th Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Scott Matheson Jr. morphed Thursday into a pre- battle test of weapons that senators may use in upcoming hearings on new Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.
Senators on the Judiciary Committee tested arguments on such issues as whether high-court nominees should have experience as a judge (neither Kagan nor Matheson does), and whether judges should be able to make laws or just interpret them (Matheson said laws should be interpreted).See the full content of this document
Extract
Senators Test Kagan Questions During Matheson Confirmation Hearing
In the end, senators of both parties generally praised Matheson's performance. "You're very impressive, sir," said Sen. Al Franken, D- Minn. The committee usually votes on nominations a few weeks after confirmation hearings....
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
7 USC 136 - Sec. 136f. Books and records | Carson v. Barnhart, (10th Cir. 2005) | united states of america, plaintiff-appellee, v. bruce henry humphrey and fay carolyn humphrey, defenda... | Rowe v. Director Dept Corr, (4th Cir. 2001) | sentencia nº 514 de consiglio di stato, february 01, 2010 | Con estos monstruos de talento y energía uno nunca pierde tiempo | Sentencia nº 1452 de Consiglio di Stato March 14 2008 | Sentencia nº 4217 de Consiglio di Stato September 28 2011