Canyon Oversight Questioned

Summary


Archaeologists and the lead advocacy group for protecting the unique antiquities in Nine Mile Canyon say a letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency perfectly sums up the impact study of oil and gas drilling there: inadequate.

The federal government's attention and response to a petition to make the area a National Historic District has been largely ignored, and even the EPA letter itself is yet another example of federal oversight that is lacking at best, said Pam Miller, chairwoman of the Nine Mile Canyon Coalition.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Canyon Oversight Questioned

"It makes me cautiously optimistic that there is some recognition that the original impact statement was severely flawed," Miller said, noting that the coalition does not oppose the gas development or drilling in the area. "What we're opposed is not knowing exactly what effect all this is having and

not having any se...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company